Model price comparisons · August 2026
DeepSeek-V4-Flash vs Gemini 2.5 Flash: API pricing compared
Same task, same tokens, two invoices. Every figure on this page is computed from our open pricing dataset, not copied from a blog post.
DeepSeek-V4-Flash is 1.29x cheaper than Gemini 2.5 Flash on a realistic task profile of 1,500 input and 500 output tokens per call, 3 calls per task: $0.00396 against $0.00510 per task, a 22% saving on identical work. Run a million tasks a month and that is the difference between $3,960 and $5,100.
| Model | Input $/1M tok | Output $/1M tok | Output multiple | $/task | $/1M tasks |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DeepSeek-V4-FlashDeepSeek · value | $0.44 | $1.32 | 3x | $0.00396 | $3,960 |
| Gemini 2.5 FlashGoogle · fast | $0.3 | $2.5 | 8.33x | $0.00510 | $5,100 |
Monthly bill at three volumes
| Tasks / month | DeepSeek-V4-Flash | Gemini 2.5 Flash | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10,000 | $40 | $51 | $11 |
| 100,000 | $396 | $510 | $114 |
| 1,000,000 | $3,960 | $5,100 | $1,140 |
Where the money goes on each
DeepSeek-V4-Flash prices output at 3x its input rate, so on this profile output is 50% of its task cost. Gemini 2.5 Flash prices output at 8.33x input, putting output at 74% of cost. The model with the higher output multiple rewards capping response length more; the one with the higher input share rewards prompt caching and context trimming more. Cost tells you nothing about quality: run both on twenty of your real cases before deciding, and treat the cheaper model as the default until it demonstrably fails.
Break-even against a dedicated GPU
Against a $2/hour dedicated instance ($1,460/month fixed), self-hosting overtakes DeepSeek-V4-Flash at 368,687 tasks per month and overtakes Gemini 2.5 Flash at 286,275 tasks per month. The full method is in the self-hosting break-even guide.
Pricing the self-hosted side? Compare on-demand GPU rates:
Compare GPU cloud pricing →Plug your own token counts into the $/task calculator, or read the full ten-model pricing comparison.
Compare against other models
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash vs Mistral SmallGemini 2.5 Flash vs Mistral Small
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash vs Grok 4.3Gemini 2.5 Flash vs Grok 4.3
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash vs GPT-5.4 miniGemini 2.5 Flash vs GPT-5.4 mini
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash vs Claude Haiku 4.5Gemini 2.5 Flash vs Claude Haiku 4.5
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash vs Claude Sonnet 5Gemini 2.5 Flash vs Claude Sonnet 5
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash vs Gemini 3.1 ProGemini 2.5 Flash vs Gemini 3.1 Pro
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash vs Claude Opus 4.8Gemini 2.5 Flash vs Claude Opus 4.8
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash vs GPT-5.5Gemini 2.5 Flash vs GPT-5.5
Frequently asked
- Which is cheaper, DeepSeek-V4-Flash or Gemini 2.5 Flash?
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash. On a task of 1,500 input and 500 output tokens across 3 calls, DeepSeek-V4-Flash costs $0.00396 per task against $0.00510 for Gemini 2.5 Flash, which makes it 1.29x cheaper (a 22% saving).
- How much do DeepSeek-V4-Flash and Gemini 2.5 Flash charge per million tokens?
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash: $0.44 per million input tokens and $1.32 per million output tokens. Gemini 2.5 Flash: $0.3 input and $2.5 output. These are published list rates as of August 2026, excluding cached, batch and long-context tiers.
- What does a million tasks cost on DeepSeek-V4-Flash vs Gemini 2.5 Flash?
- At the same fixed profile, one million tasks cost $3,960 on DeepSeek-V4-Flash and $5,100 on Gemini 2.5 Flash. The gap comes entirely from list-price differences, not from any difference in the work done.