Model price comparisons · August 2026
DeepSeek-V4-Flash vs Gemini 3.1 Pro: API pricing compared
Same task, same tokens, two invoices. Every figure on this page is computed from our open pricing dataset, not copied from a blog post.
DeepSeek-V4-Flash is 6.82x cheaper than Gemini 3.1 Pro on a realistic task profile of 1,500 input and 500 output tokens per call, 3 calls per task: $0.00396 against $0.02700 per task, a 85% saving on identical work. Run a million tasks a month and that is the difference between $3,960 and $27,000.
| Model | Input $/1M tok | Output $/1M tok | Output multiple | $/task | $/1M tasks |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DeepSeek-V4-FlashDeepSeek · value | $0.44 | $1.32 | 3x | $0.00396 | $3,960 |
| Gemini 3.1 ProGoogle · frontier | $2 | $12 | 6x | $0.02700 | $27,000 |
Monthly bill at three volumes
| Tasks / month | DeepSeek-V4-Flash | Gemini 3.1 Pro | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10,000 | $40 | $270 | $230 |
| 100,000 | $396 | $2,700 | $2,304 |
| 1,000,000 | $3,960 | $27,000 | $23,040 |
Where the money goes on each
DeepSeek-V4-Flash prices output at 3x its input rate, so on this profile output is 50% of its task cost. Gemini 3.1 Pro prices output at 6x input, putting output at 67% of cost. The model with the higher output multiple rewards capping response length more; the one with the higher input share rewards prompt caching and context trimming more. Cost tells you nothing about quality: run both on twenty of your real cases before deciding, and treat the cheaper model as the default until it demonstrably fails.
Break-even against a dedicated GPU
Against a $2/hour dedicated instance ($1,460/month fixed), self-hosting overtakes DeepSeek-V4-Flash at 368,687 tasks per month and overtakes Gemini 3.1 Pro at 54,074 tasks per month. The full method is in the self-hosting break-even guide.
Pricing the self-hosted side? Compare on-demand GPU rates:
Compare GPU cloud pricing →Plug your own token counts into the $/task calculator, or read the full ten-model pricing comparison.
Compare against other models
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash vs Mistral SmallGemini 3.1 Pro vs Mistral Small
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash vs Gemini 2.5 FlashGemini 3.1 Pro vs Gemini 2.5 Flash
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash vs Grok 4.3Gemini 3.1 Pro vs Grok 4.3
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash vs GPT-5.4 miniGemini 3.1 Pro vs GPT-5.4 mini
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash vs Claude Haiku 4.5Gemini 3.1 Pro vs Claude Haiku 4.5
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash vs Claude Sonnet 5Gemini 3.1 Pro vs Claude Sonnet 5
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash vs Claude Opus 4.8Gemini 3.1 Pro vs Claude Opus 4.8
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash vs GPT-5.5Gemini 3.1 Pro vs GPT-5.5
Frequently asked
- Which is cheaper, DeepSeek-V4-Flash or Gemini 3.1 Pro?
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash. On a task of 1,500 input and 500 output tokens across 3 calls, DeepSeek-V4-Flash costs $0.00396 per task against $0.02700 for Gemini 3.1 Pro, which makes it 6.82x cheaper (a 85% saving).
- How much do DeepSeek-V4-Flash and Gemini 3.1 Pro charge per million tokens?
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash: $0.44 per million input tokens and $1.32 per million output tokens. Gemini 3.1 Pro: $2 input and $12 output. These are published list rates as of August 2026, excluding cached, batch and long-context tiers.
- What does a million tasks cost on DeepSeek-V4-Flash vs Gemini 3.1 Pro?
- At the same fixed profile, one million tasks cost $3,960 on DeepSeek-V4-Flash and $27,000 on Gemini 3.1 Pro. The gap comes entirely from list-price differences, not from any difference in the work done.